@JAFUENTES It does look like one but Paraphysa is no longer a valid genus. The species 'scrofa' is now in the Phrixotrichus genus. It's obvious from the revision the hobby mislabeled them as scrofa. In order for it to be Phrixotrchus it needs to have two separate lateral mirror patches. That's the main difference between the two closely related genera. Therefore, we know this isn't Phrixotrichus scrofa and is in fact a Euathlus species. I'm being told by Chilian hobbyists (that know their native Ts well) that the hobby Paraphysa/Phrixotrchus scrofa is actually a form of Euathlus parvulus.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.